NCERT Books and the Supreme Court’s Intervention

The Supreme Court of India has ordered the immediate withdrawal of a newly released Class 8 Social Science textbook published by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT). The court raised serious objections to a chapter related to the judiciary and described it as a “calculated move to undermine” the institution. The judges observed that the content, at first glance, may amount to criminal contempt.

The Supreme Court directed NCERT to remove all physical and digital copies of the book without delay. It also asked NCERT and state education authorities to submit compliance reports within two weeks. In addition, the court imposed a complete ban on sharing or circulating the book in any form, including online platforms.

In response, NCERT clarified that it included the controversial content unintentionally. The council immediately stopped distributing the textbook and assured the court that it would revise the chapter. NCERT stated that it will rewrite the content and release a corrected version in the 2026–27 academic session.

Also Read: IIM Nagpur Students Miss Mid-Terms to Support 40 Disciplined Students

The case has drawn significant attention, as it highlights the importance of accuracy and responsibility in school textbooks. The Supreme Court’s action sends a clear message about protecting the dignity and integrity of constitutional institutions.

NCERT Textbook Sparks Controversy

The controversy focuses on Exploring Society: India and Beyond, Vol II, which NCERT released on February 24, 2026. In Chapter 4, titled “The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society,” the book mentioned corruption in the judiciary, complaints against judges, lack of transparency, and parts of a former Chief Justice of India’s speech.

After reading a newspaper report, the Supreme Court expressed strong shock over the content. The bench said the Constitution clearly defines the roles of the legislature, judiciary, and executive to protect democracy and ensure their independence. The court also said schools must carefully review such content because it can affect how students view the judiciary.

Also Read: India Announces Dividend Tax Reduction for French Investors